How does AskLLM measure LLM visibility for Protein supplements?

We run 6 prompts (8 with a competitor) on ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. LVI = (0.35 × Visibility) + (0.2 × Favorability) + (0.15 × Factuality) + (0.15 × Actionability) + (0.15 × Consistency). Factuality is not measured: its weight is reserved and contributes 0, so the attainable maximum is 85.

Which brands dominate protein supplements prompts in generative search today?

Incumbent leaders in this snapshot are derived from specialist audit baselines and public category research. Run a named-competitor audit to see how your client compares on the same prompt pack.

Can agencies use this protein supplements benchmark in client pitches?

Yes. Export the sector pitch sheet, copy individual prompts, and link to a live audit with the category pre-selected for repeatable QBR reporting.

[ SECTOR: PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS ] · 6 PROMPTS (8 WITH A COMPETITOR) · UPDATED JUL 2026

Agency-ready sector briefing for Protein supplements

6 prompts (8 with a competitor) · 2 LLMs MonitoredIndustry benchmarks

Protein supplements

Protein powder discovery is increasingly conversational: buyers specify isolate vs concentrate, plant vs whey, and macro constraints in chat. Institutional audits map retrieval salience across formulation-specific prompts and competitor co-mention graphs.

Audited by AskLLM Sector Intelligence Team · Updated Jul 2026

Isolate vs concentrate
Macro constraints
Review corroboration

Prompt playbook

Buyer-intent vectors your clients compete on in generative shortlists. Copy into pitch decks or run live in ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

ChatGPT 5Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
“Best whey isolate for lactose-sensitive athletes?”
ChatGPT 5Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
“Clean plant protein powder without artificial sweeteners?”
ChatGPT 5Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
“High-protein powder for muscle gain on a budget?”

Live sector leaderboard

Share of voice (Protein supplements)

Full leaderboard →

Optimum Nutrition
Category incumbent
31%
Orgain
High recall
24%
Dymatize
Moderate recall
18%
Unclaimed visibility gapClaim this gap for your client →
Unclaimed visibility gap
27%

Directional benchmark for protein supplements buyer prompts. Re-audit to track movement.

Citation sources models weight

Run the same prompt matrix on your client's brand and named competitor, scored across ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in under two minutes.

Pre-configured with 6 prompts (8 with a competitor)

Uses 1 credit · ~2 min setup

How LVI scoring works · Browse all categories

Category FAQ

How does AskLLM measure LLM visibility for Protein supplements?: We run 6 prompts (8 with a competitor) on ChatGPT 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. LVI = (0.35 × Visibility) + (0.2 × Favorability) + (0.15 × Factuality) + (0.15 × Actionability) + (0.15 × Consistency). Factuality is not measured: its weight is reserved and contributes 0, so the attainable maximum is 85.
Which brands dominate protein supplements prompts in generative search today?: Incumbent leaders in this snapshot are derived from specialist audit baselines and public category research. Run a named-competitor audit to see how your client compares on the same prompt pack.
Can agencies use this protein supplements benchmark in client pitches?: Yes. Export the sector pitch sheet, copy individual prompts, and link to a live audit with the category pre-selected for repeatable QBR reporting.